jonny_boy34 wrote:I could of course argue that the fact there's no evidence of it means it's probably not true...
Yeah this is the closest an atheist can realistically get - it's why Richard Dawkins in his book has a whole section called 'Why God Almost Certainly Does Not Exist', and not 'Why God Does Not Exist'. It is a question of evidence, and while no, we cannot say "God DOES NOT exist", we certainly can say "the probability of God existing is tiny, based on the available evidence".
It may be useful reading this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism#De ... stinctions
Although ultimately I don't much care how it's all defined - if someone asks I'm an atheist, just like I'm an atheist towards fairies; I do not believe in fairies. I do not know fairies do not exist, but I see no evidence for them and think they are extremely unlikely.
I should not push my beliefs on to anyone else, for I would hate for someone to do the same to me.
I'm sure most would agree with that - although the question is, is UNbelief the same as belief? What doctrines and opinions are part of the "atheism" package? It is simply saying you don't believe in someone else's God.




