Welcome to UK Thrash!

nuclear blast sign: meltdown or "lets all talk shite"

Talk about all thrash metal.

Moderators: James, Craig, Resilience Records

Re: nuclear blast sign: meltdown

Postby thrashduck on Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:14 pm

Yeh, not very interesting at all. Thrash by numbers pedestrian lock.
IN A BAND?! SEND ME NEWS NOW!
http://www.facebook.com/ukthrashpodcast

NEKROKANNIBAL wrote: delete this account now coz this forum is pure fuckin gay lame shit
thrashduck
User avatar
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:03 am
Location: Super Leeds

Re: nuclear blast sign: meltdown

Postby gamabomb on Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:39 pm

only dicking about harris :)
GAMA BOMB - Faster Is Gooder
gamabomb
User avatar
 
Posts: 558
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:13 pm
Location: Newry/Dublin, Ireland

Re: nuclear blast sign: meltdown

Postby James on Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:18 pm

It is cool that people are paying attention to thrash, but the fact that it seems so "in fashion" to snap up all these young bands does seem like a reason for caution to me...

How do we know they won't drop them just as quickly when the 'fad' dies down? Also, nothing against the signed bands, but if people are right that this band are quite typical and generic (I havent checked out the Myspace yet) then doesn't it devalue the fact of being signed too?

I would personally never sign to a label like Earache or Nuclear Blast, but it does all depend on where you want to take your band and what you want it to sound like.
thrashduck wrote:And the internet was without uk thrash form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of James moved upon the face of the waters.

"No Hellscourger, I would not like a strawberry."
James
Administrator
User avatar
 
Posts: 8334
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:17 pm
Location: Witham, Essex

Re: nuclear blast sign: meltdown

Postby Metal Iain on Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:45 pm

MartinC wrote:
gamabomb wrote:well they got signed unlike......


So did Phil Collins, what's your point?

So Nuclear Blast are at it too now? I really wish I could get all these record labels together and for their own good just tell them what a totally shit idea it is signing all this garbage. This band are worse than any of the Earache bands, and that's saying a lot.


Let's not drag Phil Collins down to this level because, firstly, he got signed to a decent label and, secondly, No Jacket Required is much better than any album released by any Thrash band ever.

Otherwise, fine chat.
Image
Metal Iain
User avatar
 
Posts: 7332
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 4:54 pm
Location: Dunfermline, Scotland

Re: nuclear blast sign: meltdown

Postby Holy Crap! Lions! on Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:06 pm

James wrote:It is cool that people are paying attention to thrash, but the fact that it seems so "in fashion" to snap up all these young bands does seem like a reason for caution to me...

How do we know they won't drop them just as quickly when the 'fad' dies down? Also, nothing against the signed bands, but if people are right that this band are quite typical and generic (I havent checked out the Myspace yet) then doesn't it devalue the fact of being signed too?

I would personally never sign to a label like Earache or Nuclear Blast, but it does all depend on where you want to take your band and what you want it to sound like.


Basically, this.

The labels are going to squeeze as much money as they can out of these bands and then drop them.

Honestly, Meltdown are fucking terrible. Bonded by Blood are fucking terrible. It's BORING.
They are getting signed because at the moment they can be used to make money.

There are hardly any interesting Thrash bands around which is a shame because as a genre it allows for a high degree of uniqueness, unlike Death Metal or Black Metal.
Holy Crap! Lions!
User avatar
 
Posts: 1141
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:27 pm
Location: Plymouth

Re: nuclear blast sign: meltdown

Postby Dian Wei on Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:24 pm

Holy Crap! Lions! wrote:There are hardly any interesting Thrash bands around which is a shame because as a genre it allows for a high degree of uniqueness, unlike Death Metal or Black Metal.


Fail and aids statement.
Gee.... I don't know about the rest of you guys, but lately the only things that truly motivate me are erections and bowel movements.

Thank the Police coming straight from the underground...
Image
Dian Wei
 
Posts: 9132
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:24 pm
Location: In the misty morning, on the edge of time.

Re: nuclear blast sign: meltdown

Postby MartinC on Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:39 pm

Mate, don't bother, he's going through a hard time right now.
MartinC
 
Posts: 6856
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:10 pm

Re: nuclear blast sign: meltdown

Postby James on Wed Apr 23, 2008 12:34 am

hahahaha
thrashduck wrote:And the internet was without uk thrash form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of James moved upon the face of the waters.

"No Hellscourger, I would not like a strawberry."
James
Administrator
User avatar
 
Posts: 8334
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:17 pm
Location: Witham, Essex

Re: nuclear blast sign: meltdown

Postby ShredFiendLee on Wed Apr 23, 2008 1:14 am

Good band great live...


lead guitarist shreds like no other.


they are originally from Pittsburgh and moved out to LA not so long ago.

They use to come down and play shows out here all the time bout time they moved down.
ShredFiendLee
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 8:01 am

Re: nuclear blast sign: meltdown

Postby GoreBastard on Wed Apr 23, 2008 1:51 am

James wrote:It is cool that people are paying attention to thrash, but the fact that it seems so "in fashion" to snap up all these young bands does seem like a reason for caution to me...

How do we know they won't drop them just as quickly when the 'fad' dies down? Also, nothing against the signed bands, but if people are right that this band are quite typical and generic (I havent checked out the Myspace yet) then doesn't it devalue the fact of being signed too?


Yeah, exactly what I was gonna say, but in more "stupider" words.
GoreBastard
User avatar
 
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:26 am
Location: Quiverpool

Re: nuclear blast sign: meltdown

Postby thrashduck on Wed Apr 23, 2008 1:57 am

Sackhmet.
IN A BAND?! SEND ME NEWS NOW!
http://www.facebook.com/ukthrashpodcast

NEKROKANNIBAL wrote: delete this account now coz this forum is pure fuckin gay lame shit
thrashduck
User avatar
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:03 am
Location: Super Leeds

Re: nuclear blast sign: meltdown

Postby jonny_boy34 on Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:30 am

I haven't listened to this yet, but my opinion is that generally, when this thrash fad does die down, the bands who truly are good and who are in it for a long run will last, and will survive the fall. The bands who have been picked up for their use of the cliches and stereotypical thrash ideas won't last. Then we will just be left with the good thrash bands and everything will be fine.
jonny_boy34
User avatar
 
Posts: 6438
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: North-West London

Re: nuclear blast sign: meltdown

Postby Holy Crap! Lions! on Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:59 am

Dian Wei wrote:
Holy Crap! Lions! wrote:There are hardly any interesting Thrash bands around which is a shame because as a genre it allows for a high degree of uniqueness, unlike Death Metal or Black Metal.


Fail and aids statement.


How? I love Death Metal but there are so many limitations on any extreme metal that aren't there with Thrash, unless you get into Prog or experimental territory.
Holy Crap! Lions!
User avatar
 
Posts: 1141
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:27 pm
Location: Plymouth

Re: nuclear blast sign: meltdown

Postby terrorizer on Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:00 am

That is just so generic. It sounds like 80s thrash and I want my thrash to sound like something entirely different. :roll: My advice is not to worry about who is signing whom and how long the thrash fad will be around for, just enjoy it while it's here. Lot's of thrash bands is better than hardly any.
Image

"If you want a picture of the future of UK Thrash, imagine a boot stamping on a Member's face, forever."
terrorizer
User avatar
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 2:44 pm
Location: Burton upon Trent

Re: nuclear blast sign: meltdown

Postby ShredFiendLee on Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:48 am

terrorizer wrote:That is just so generic. It sounds like 80s thrash and I want my thrash to sound like something entirely different. :roll: My advice is not to worry about who is signing whom and how long the thrash fad will be around for, just enjoy it while it's here. Lot's of thrash bands is better than hardly any.

Best thing ever posted on this forum =D>
ShredFiendLee
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 8:01 am